- Automatic
- Inexpensive
- Wireless
BLUETOOTH compared to Infrared (IR)
Infrared technology uses the longer wavelengths in the red region of the electromagnetic spectrum that are beyond the range of human vision. The human eye cannot receive and interpret these wavelengths. Infrared technology is used by a television remote control. Although IR wireless communication is inexpensive and easy for manufacturers to incorporate into devices, this technology has a few drawbacks. The following table compares Infrared to BLUETOOTH.
Specification | Infrared | BLUETOOTH |
Number of devices that can communicate simultaneously | Only two devices may communicate with each other | Multiple devices may communicate with each other within a specific operating distance |
Line of sight | Transmitters and receivers must be almost directly aligned (i.e., able to see each other) | May operate without being in direct line-of-sight |
Transmission impediments (people, walls, plants, etc.) | may block the transmission of the signal | may slow the transmission of the signal |
Range | Performance drops with distance | Performance better than IR with distance |
Speed | Data transmission rate fairly slow | Data transmission rate slightly lower than typical wired transmissions |
NOTE: BLUETOOTH-Technology enabled devices resolve problems that are inherent with the Infrared technology.
Here are some examples:
- BLUETOOTH has larger range of data transmission as compared to the IR.
- BLUETOOTH is not prone to interference from light.
- Unlike IR devices, BLUETOOTH devices do not have to be directly aligned or close to each other to function correctly.
This allows BLUETOOTH-Technology enabled devices to function over a wider distance.
The following table compares Wi-Fi with BLUETOOTH:
Specification | Wi-Fi | BLUETOOTH |
Radio frequency | 2.45 or 5.0 GHz | 2.45 GHz |
Signal Strength | Strong, covers greater distances, and provides higher throughput | Not as effective as Wi-Fi |
Setup | Configuration is complicated | Configuration is less complicated |
Hardware | More expensive | Less expensive |
Range | Approximately 300 to 500 feet depending on Wi-Fi standard used. Performance drops with longer distances. | Approximately 30 feet. Performance better than IR. |
NOTE: BLUETOOTH and Wi-Fi enabled devices operate on the same frequency range, but use different multiplexing schemes to avoid communication collisions.